My project is pursuing IPpc90 Social Equity Within the Project Team, Option 2. The project is 100% owned by our client and there are no other equity shareholders. Is a table showing the equity breakdown still required, or does a sentence listing the owner as having 100% of the equity sufficient?
Additionally, is there a reason the pilot credit name on the forum ("Social equity within the operations and maintenance staff") still does not match the credit library ("Social equity within the project team")? It seems this has been an open issue since 2023 and has caused some confusion for our team.
LEEDuser Basic Member
0 thumbs up