Martin, I would have to double-check if this applies to NC 2.2 (it probably does), but in LEED 2009 there are two factors that apply to this credit, a) # of building users at peak periods, and b) FTE.
You're supposed to use FTE to determine the number of showers provided — so use the largest volume shift for that. For the bike racks, the measurement of users at peak periods would probably need to factor in a higher volume of users at shift overlaps. This number is quite likely higher than FTE.
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
I have never seen any requirement that the shift change would need to be factored in, as this could double the storage capacity required. I agree with Tristan about how the FTE is likely applied.
I actually received a Review comment on a v2.2 project regarding shift changes. The Reviewer stated that bike racks also need to provide space for the shift coming on while the other shifts are still working. So, the 2 shifts that work back-to-back need to be combined and use that number. I used a different methodology of using the largest shift, plus 1/2 of the oncoming shift. The Reviewer said that approach wasn't acceptable.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.