We would like to clarify the possible Alternative Compliance Paths (ACP) options for the EAc1 (our project is C&S). There are the three standard ways to achieve credits under the EAc1: Option 1 - Whole building energy simulation, Option 2 - Prescriptive compliance path: ASHRAE Energy design guide and Option 3 - Prescriptive compliance path: Advanced buidings core performance. Next to these three options, there is also the ACP Alternative Energy Performance Metric EApc95, as described here: https://www.usgbc.org/node/7489409?return=/pilotcredits/New-Construction/v2009 Next, there is also the LEED 2009 Core and Shell EAp2-c1 Alternative Compliance Path described here: https://www.usgbc.org/resources/cs-2009-eap2-c1-acp In our understanding, the second ACP is applicable only within the EAc1: Option 1 - Whole building energy simulation, as it is based on energy modeling. Also, this APC is completely separate from the first APC. Is our understanding correct? Many thanks
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Yes the ACP can only be used with Option 1.
Thank you for the prompt answer Marcus, that clarifies the situation.
Is there any analogous ACP for LEED v4 that adjusts the point tiers based upon the percent of energy uses that are owner controlled? https://www.usgbc.org/resources/cs-2009-eap2-c1-acp
No this ACP only applies to v2009
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.