Hi, I have posted the same topic under EAp2 for C&S v.2009 but I guess it is more relevant to post it here. Hi, Our project has received a denial for EAp2 and we intend to appeal. While following the recommendations of the reviewer for some unsolved issues, we realized that the equipment load we had assumed for a Core&Shell building is rather high in comparison to the recommendation of User's Manual Table G-C. Can we revise the equipment load input refering to User's Manual recommendation for Core&Shell buildings prior to an appeal? Note that this revise leads to an increase of cost savings, and an increase of points. I have read in some posts that Tristan Roberts encourages to take contact with the reviewer via GBCI. Is that possible, and how could someone get track on his reviewer? It could be positive to discuss for some specific comments that might remain uncertain and lead to further appeals. Has someone contacted a reviewer and how can it be done? Thanks in advance!
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Therese, you can contact GBCI via the contact form on their website. Include your project number, and your specific question. They are being very proactive about handling questions like yours.
You can change the equipment load. As long as you have a good explanation for doing so the fact that the savings go up does not matter.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.