See all forum discussions about CI-2009 SSc3.3
 Subscribe to new posts about CI-2009 SSc3.3 Post a new question aboutCI-2009 SSc3.3
See LEEDuser’s guidance on CI-2009 SSc3.3»
FAQs about SSc3.3 :

Why are the CI designated parking requirements in Cases 1 and & 2 Option 1 determined by a Full Time Equivalent of tenant space/building while for New Construction the requirements are simply a percentage of parking provided?

If a CI project occupies a building that has existing parking, but no designated parking to the tenant, can it pursue “no parking will be provided"?

View answers »

Forum discussion

CI-2009 SSc3.3:Alternative Transportation—Parking Availability

Retail - commercial interiors

Default Avatar
eileen hughes
Perkowitz+Ruth Architects
LEEDuser Basic Member
28 thumbs up

There is existing parking but no DESIGNATED parking will be provided for Tenant employees. Can we pursue Case 1 LESS THAN 75% OF BUILDING AREA, path # 2 No parking will be provided or subsidized for tenant employees?

5
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 07/22/2011 - 21:54

I have this same question. We are renovating roughly 20% of a current warehouse into office space. There is an existing parking lot for the building, but no new parking will be provided. Does this qualify as Case 1 option 2?
Profile picture for user ateliertengreen
Larry Jones
Associate Director
Atelier Ten
LEEDuser Basic Member
169 thumbs up

Wed, 08/10/2011 - 21:09

I believe both of you would attempt the credit using Case 1 Option 2. If there is existing parking but nothing is being added because of your project, then it would be considered no new parking. As long as there are no subsidies for the tenants, you should be fine.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.