Regularly Occupied Spaces Consistency Across All Credits

We provided a sample floor plan of future tenant area to document this credit. We received the following review comment: "The total regularly occupied area reported in the calculations for IEQc8.2 is inconsistent with the total regularly occupied area reported within PIf3: Occupant and Usage Data. Provide a narrative describing how the total regularly occupied area was determined." Has anyone had experience with a reviewer comment like this? It seems to me that inconsistencies are sure to exist when dealing with "sample" tenant plans. My hope is that a narrative response like the following will be sufficient: "The regularly occupied area reported within PIf3 is the total available future tenant space, the regularly occupied area reported within IEQc8.2 is specific to the sample floor plan shown and excludes typical office support areas that are not considered regularly occupied such as storage rooms and kitchen areas. Regularly occupied area may vary as actual tenant floor plans are developed." Many thanks!