FAQs about EAp2 :

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

PI form 2 vs Energy Simulation Floor Area

We have a conflict between the LEED floor area which clearly excludes underground parking (in our case) and the area of the energy simulation. I have tried to find clarification on the area of the Energy Simulation for underground levels but cannot find clear direction. Our building has three underground levels that include 2 small offices that are conditioned with split units. The parking areas are mechanically exhausted. It was logical to me (which always gets me in trouble with LEED and ASHRAE) to include the underground levels in the simulation due to the requirement to perform a Whole Building Energy Simulation and account for lighting, fan power, f-factor, etc. The only way to correct this discrepancy that I can think of is to model both baseline and proposed building as slab on grade. Any clarification is greatly appreciated.

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 10/09/2013 - 19:57

Is the underground parking part of your LEED project? If not then it would not be included in the model. If so it would be included in the model. Be sure to delineate between conditioned and unconditioned spaces. Explaining what may appear to be an inconsistency always goes a long way to helping the reviewer to understand the situation. You know your project, they only know what you tell them. What is obvious to you, may not be to them.

Wed, 10/09/2013 - 21:59

Thanks Marcus, We excluded all parking areas (underground for us) in the area calculation for the PI form. I see now on the template for EAp2 where we can explain the difference in area used in the model. Our narrative description and the floor plans and section views clearly show the underground parking. Onward! See you in Philly

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.