Forum discussion

EBOM-2009 MRc1: Sustainable Purchasing—Ongoing Consumables

See LEEDuser’s guidance on EBOM-2009 MRc1 »

performance period for re-certification

October 28, 2016

Pablo Fortunato Suarez

Principal ESD Consultant/Architect
GreenArc Sustainable Building & Architecture

LEEDuser Basic Member

253 thumbs up

October 28, 2016

The LEED Re-certification Guidance document recommends submission of purchases of the most recent 25% of performance period. Are we allowed to include data prior to that period as well?

Post a reply

Trista Brown

Project Director
WSP USA

LEEDuser Basic Member

449 thumbs up

November 29, 2016 - 9:35 pm

Hi Pablo, teams must provide purchasing data for the most recent 25% of the recertification performance period (so it's more than a recommendation, it's a requirement). But yes, you're allowed to go back further in time at your discretion.

Log in or register to post comments

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.

See all forum discussions about EBOM-2009 MRc1

Subscribe to new posts about EBOM-2009 MRc1

Post a new question about EBOM-2009 MRc1

See LEEDuser’s guidance on EBOM-2009 MRc1 »

FAQs about MRc1:

We purchased hundreds of ongoing consumables items during our performance period. Do we have to enter each discrete purchase into the LEED Online credit form?

Our organization has a centralized purchasing program that buys products for several buildings, including the one pursuing LEED-EBOM certification. It’s difficult to track which ongoing consumable goods purchases are used in the EBOM building versus the

Purchasing for our organization takes place in the EBOM project building, but not all ongoing consumable goods that are purchased end up being used there. Should we include all of the purchases in MRc1?

We have multiple tenants in our building, some of which are nonresponsive to requests for purchasing records. Can we exclude their purchases?

Does a signed letter from a product manufacturer that states the sustainability criteria met by a particular product count as acceptable LEED documentation?

Do manufacturer claims about the average recycled content, etc. in all its products count as acceptable LEED documentation? For example, a toner cartridge website says that the average post-consumer recycled content is 90% across all its toner products.

Lots of products we purchase seem like they could be tracked in two different purchasing credits. For example, toilet tissue seem like an ongoing consumable since it’s replaced frequently at a low cost per unit (MRc1), but it’s also used for our green

The credit language says we need to track paper (printing or copy paper, notebooks, notepads, envelopes), toner cartridges, binders, batteries and desk accessories. Is that everything we have to track for this credit?

View answers »