Forum discussion

NC-v4 SSc5:Heat island reduction

Parking Under Cover and SRI Requirement

Hi,

Our project have a 100% parking space under cover which means we are okay with option 2. Do we need to comply with SRI value on the roof deck?

Thank you in advance.
 

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 10/09/2019 - 22:40

Hi Summer,  You are not required to have any certain SRI for your roof if you're not pursuing Opt 1 of this credit.

Thu, 10/10/2019 - 01:23

Hi Emily, Thanks a lot for your prompt response. Now it's more clearer in my understanding.

Wed, 11/27/2019 - 15:06

Hello Summer and Emily,  It is probably worth clarifying that according to the NCv4 requirements for this credit, in order for the parking spaces on the top level of a parking deck (or at grade parking) to contribute towards the 75% threshold of Option 2, a roof immediately over such spaces actually would have to comply with a minimum 3-yr aged SRI of 32 (or, if three-year aged value information is not available, an initial SRI of at least 39), or be a vegetated roof, or be covered by energy generation systems.  However, if you are referring to parking that is located under a building (more specifically, under enclosed gross floor area), even the top level of such a parking structure would contribute towards the 75% threshold regardless of the SRI of the roof above the building itself.  An SRI requirement does not exist for parking placed underground, under deck, or under a building.  Parking located directly below other parking levels would all be considered 'under deck'.

Tue, 03/10/2020 - 02:20

We have a few outdoor parking slots that cannot be fully covered. 1.6m out of a 5m length of parking space is left uncovered. Our other parking slots are located under the building. Can we still vy for the option of 100% parking under cover? Thanks

Tue, 03/10/2020 - 15:10

Hi Hannah,  It's wonderful that you are making such an effort to reach the exemplary performance threshold for this credit!  That said, the default assumption should be that a parking space that is not fully covered by qualifying roof/deck/cover cannot contribute towards meeting the requirements.  However, of course, you can attempt any level of achievement for any credit and reviewers will consider special circumstances on a case-by-case basis.  Any pertinent mitigating factors should be detailed for the consideration of the reviewers.

Wed, 03/18/2020 - 19:20

To confirm, if 100% of a project's parking scope was "underdeck", or placed under a building, would a project automatically qualify for Option 2 as there is no roof specifically for parking (and have no SRI or vegetated roof/Renewable energy requirements)? 

Mon, 03/23/2020 - 17:22

Yes.  (However, it should be noted that unless the entire parking garage area in such a scenario also happens to be located under the footprint of the building's gross floor area, it's not likely that 100% of the parking would be compliant as some of it would likely be located, exposed, on the top deck of said parking garage.)  

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.