You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium forForum discussion
NC-v4 EAp1: Fundamental commissioning and verification
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-v4 EAp1 »
OPR & BOD & Design Document review
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.
See all forum discussions about NC-v4 EAp1
Subscribe to new posts about NC-v4 EAp1
Post a new question about NC-v4 EAp1
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-v4 EAp1 »
FAQs about EAp1:
For a building with individual systems per unit, does every single system need to be commissioned?
What kinds of projects must the CxA demonstrate experience on?
What level of authority does the CxA have towards correcting inaccurate or erroneous construction?
Can the CxA be a member of the design or construction team?
Joyce Kelly
Architect - Cx Provider - Green Building SpecialistGLHN Architects & Engineers
27 thumbs up
October 4, 2022 - 7:04 pm
That's one of several inconsistencies I've noticed in this credit that haven't been addressed in addenda.
The credit language also indicates the Cx Provider develops the OPR and BOD. In the next paragraph, we just review them.
If you ask ASHRAE, we review it, we verify it, we may even provide a format for it but we're not responsible for creating it.
https://www.ashrae.org/file%20library/about/new%20hq/ashrae-opr-attachme...
Edgar Arevalo
Associate19 thumbs up
August 9, 2023 - 7:03 pm
Yeah I'm confused by the credit language as well. Is the design team responsible for reviewing the OPR? Is that first created by the owner rep so that the design team can review? Is the design team responsible for creating the BOD