Forum discussion

Ongoing Commissioning Overlap with New Building Commissioning

3

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 08/11/2010 - 19:20

I'm concerned that documenting EA2.1 and EA2.2 are independent of documenting EA2.3 and require independent processes. In short, if your team is identifying cost saving measures during the first 10 months using EA2.1 it might not satisfy putting into practice 50% of an ongoing retro commissioning plan. (Required by this credit.) What are your thoughts?

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 14:25

That's a good point...the issue might be more about whether work done can contribute to the credit if it was done before a 'Formal LEED compliant' retro-commissiong plan was developed (but within the 2 year window provided by initial EB certification).....Maybe as part of an alternative compliance path around 'out of LEED sequence' work that meets the credit intent?

Tue, 07/12/2011 - 19:41

Doug, I have the same question. Did you ever pursue using a LEED NC Enhanced Commissioning as the 1st half of the Ongoing RCx process? Did it work? Thanks, Sonrisa

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.