FAQs about EAp2 :

I have a mixed-use building and am wondering if it is possible to pursue the prerequisite through Case 1. How do we proceed?

We have a building that consists of two attached structures and it’s unclear if we have to consider it a single building or if it should be certified as two separate buildings and benchmarked accordingly. How should we proceed?

How long is an Energy Star label valid to use with a streamlined approach for Case 1?

Our building includes heavy process loads that significantly increase the overall energy use in the building. If we submeter these loads, can we exclude this energy use for benchmarking purposes?

We have installed submeters on our building but the utility bill includes energy use from several other buildings located on the same campus. How do we reconcile this during the LEED review process?

When is it possible to exclude up to 10% of the building from EAp2?

What do I do if the number of building occupants, operating hours, or vacant space changes during the performance period?

If you pursue the streamlined path for an Energy Star label, should the performance period for EAc6 match the 12-month time frame of the label?

How do I account for computers with multiple monitors on Portfolio Manager?

How should I treat vacant space on Portfolio Manager?

Our building includes a large laboratory space. Can our project benchmark under the Labs21 program?

We have an international project and the space type is eligible for an Energy Star rating. Can we pursue Case 1 to demonstrate compliance given the recently released alternative compliance paths for international projects?

We have a number of buildings on a single campus that we would like to certify at the same time. Is it possible to benchmark the buildings at the campus level?

View answers »

Forum discussion

EBOM-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Efficiency Performance

Office Building Outside US

Which path is to be followed for an office building outside the US? Is this considered to be eligible for an Energy Star rating? If not, what are the choices of setting a benchmark? Thanks for any replies,

6

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Tue, 04/26/2011 - 21:34

Omer, office buildings outside the U.S. can (and should) use Energy Star Portfolio Manager to benchmark their performance.

Fri, 06/10/2011 - 02:32

1. Do international projects still compare with the US average as their baseline EUI? It will not make any senses, so where can I adjust climate data to make sure its comparing with similar weather condition for an international project? 2. What if our building(11F total) has three floors unoccupied which means our total annual energy use will be a lot lower than 100% occupied? Can you deduct the gross floor area of these 3 floors from total building gross floor area?

Tue, 11/22/2011 - 17:10

Tristan - Do I understand correctly that office buildings outside the US can no longer use Portfolio Manager to benchmark and must now use the calculator? The October update and the current LEED On-line forms appear to indicate that Option 1 is no longer an option. I've just done a trial run with the calculator but it is telling me N/A. We're close to full points in Portfolio manager with an EUI of 214 but don't appear to meet the pre-requisite (under Option 1 of the calculator) because the adjusted national average for office space is 182. I suspect this is because the underground parking is included in my 214 but not in the 182.

Tue, 11/22/2011 - 21:21

Michael, That would make guaranteeing a Gold certification significantly harder wouldn't it? No worries, see the USGBC response to my query on the same issue below. "Good news. Looks like it was just a mix up. "Thanks for your question about EAp2 and EAc1 for EB projects outside of the U.S. The language stating that Case 1 was not available to projects outside of the U.S. was erroneously included in the Rating System with ACPs. The case IS available to projects outside of the U.S. and the box stating otherwise has been removed from the Rating System.""

Tue, 11/22/2011 - 21:30

For the full post you can go here - http://www.leeduser.com/topic/international-projects-alternative-compliance-path#comment-19012

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.