Dear community, We have pursued this credit with option 1 and have achieved 52.31% only with the use of high efficiency WC and urinals. Now, the reviewer has sent very weird comments for this credit stating that we have not demonstrated the non-potable water available for sewage conveyance. Well of course not because we do not plan to. There is rainwater collection in this project but only for irrigation purpose. And he does mention that we have provided documentation for WEc1 to confirm the availability of the quantity of the non-potable water claimed. This is true but we have demonstrated this quantity only to earn credit WEc1, nothing to do with WEc2. I am very tempted to think that the reviewer got confused between the credits and our intent in using rainwater but before I answer that, I would like to know if someone has encountered the same issue. With many thanks,
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.