FAQs about EAp2 :

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

New Table 1.4 Spreadsheet SI-Units

Dear all, we gladly noticed that the Table 1.4 spreadsheet improved a lot. Now it is more like a interactive toolkit. Unfortunately most of the items are just in IP-Units available. That makes this kit very error-prone because we are working in SI-Units and have to transfer everything (e.g. U-Values). I asked the GBCI if a SI-Unit-implementation is planned - they replied "As far as we know, this is not in development". We would appreciate, if this will be developed shortly, also becaused SI-units are generaly admitted by the USGBC. I would like to ask you if you are also concerned by this to ask again and again for it, to put some pressure on it. Merci! regards, Johannes

2

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Tue, 11/20/2012 - 07:33

I would second that as well would 40% of all LEED projects being outside of the states (i.e. using the metric system...funny, when I think about it, just the states still uses IP).

Tue, 11/20/2012 - 14:45

We do remain backward when it comes to measuring things. If the project does not do the conversion then the reviewer must do it since the reviewers are mostly familiar with the IP units. USGBC has a conversion tool and we developed our own spreadsheet to help as well. Ideally the form would contain both and you could enter one or the other and it would do the conversion.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.