Has anyone tried to pursue LEEDv4 LT High Priority Site as an alternative compliance path for SSc3 Brownfield Redevelopment?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
Dave Hubka
Practice Leader - SustainabilityEUA
LEEDuser Expert
530 thumbs up
July 23, 2019 - 7:42 pm
this is a very good question.
I don't believe the v4 High Priority Site credit is listed as an ACP to the v3 Brownfield credit, nor is it listed on the v4/v2009 credit substitution list.
The intent of each credit is quite similar but not identical. I could argue for, and against, your approach.
If the project will be located on an infill location within a historic district it is worth a shot to submit as an ACP to v3 Brownfield credit...you'll lose the credit anyway if you don't submit.
In my experience, it seems ACPs and credit substitutions that are not identified by USGBC have a difficult time being approved through the standard review process and more than likely require a CIR.
Apologies i could not give you a definitive yes or no.
Good Luck!