We were trying to pursue this credit by developing and implementing a M&V plan following option C from the IPMVP, but after reading some comments, it seems that this path was removed.
I can not follow option B, since most EEM interact among each other, therefore, they may not be isolated.
The only path left would be option D, but we don't have energy simulation results to compare with. The owners currently operate in a slightly smaller building, and they are now moving across the street to a larger complex, renovating lighting, HVAC, refrigeration equipment, etc; and pursing the LEED CI certification. Could we consider their previous energy usage as the baseline case, making the proper adjustment for the increase in sf? Then, after one year of energy usage data during operation, they may compare themselves to their previous usage and evaluate additional improvements on a month to month basis.
This guys are high energy users, and they want to know exactly how much each end use consumes to evaluate their performance and continuously improve; it seems unreasonable that there is no path for this case without the energy model.
Any thoughts?
Thank you very much, I appreciate the help.
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for $... »
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5931 thumbs up
May 19, 2015 - 4:10 pm
What you are proposing is a simplified version of Option C which was removed.
If "they want to know exactly how much each end use consumes to evaluate their performance and continuously improve" - they won't be able to do that by comparing previous bills to adjusted current ones. A energy model could be useful fore achieving this aim.
Gaston Michaud
Mechanical EngineerENEX
16 thumbs up
May 19, 2015 - 7:21 pm
The problem is that there is no budget for an energy model...
They wouldn't be able to compare their energy usage with the simulation results, but they would be able to monitor their consumption and evaluate any operational change or under performance, which is also very valuable.
So basically, if you can't isolate EEM, the only way to earn this credit is by including an energy model and then calibrate it during operation?
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5931 thumbs up
May 20, 2015 - 12:47 pm
Monitoring energy use certainly can provide value. It is not enough to earn this credit however. In a Case 2 scenario that is what it takes to earn the credit.
I have not looked to see if the v4 version of this credit can be used by 2009 projects as a substitute. If so the IPMVP stuff was deleted and it is all about installing meters on energy end uses.