The project in question is being constructed on an urban medical campus.

I see from this forum that "Based on the MPR Supplemental Guidance for MPR #3, your boundary has to include all land that will be disturbed for the purpose of undertaking the LEED project."

When we define our LEED boundary to match our construction limit line, we are including area where a future building is planned (dense urban campus - this project involves improvements - including parking - that are on land that will someday become another building). Because of this we feel the project is not meeting requirement 4 of the Must Use a Reasonable Site Boundary "no given parcel of real property within the LEED project boundary has ever been or ever will be attributed to another LEED project building"

So do we think it would be acceptable then to pull in the LEED boundary so that it will jigsaw with the anticipated boundary for the future development too. All buildings on this campus are to be LEED.