Why can't Monitor-Based Commissioning be achieved without pursuing the Enhanced Commissioning path?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium forForum discussion
NC-v4 EAc1: Enhanced commissioning
Why can't Monitor-Based Commissioning be achieved without pursuing the Enhanced Commissioning path?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium forTo post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.
Afogreen Build
www.afogreenbuild.comGreen Building Consultant
212 thumbs up
September 13, 2021 - 8:49 pm
Hi David,
You can see the intent of Enhanced Commissioning in LEED guide page 390, that explains “Enhanced commissioning is a natural extension of the fundamental commissioning (Cx) process. It provides owners, via the commissioning authority (CxA), further oversight and verification that the building will meet their expectations and requirements beyond the first day of occupancy.”
And, LEED explains the goals of monitoring-based commissioning as “Monitoring-based commissioning (MBCx) gives the building owner, operators, and the CxA a continual stream of information that helps them identify operational issues as they occur, thereby saving time, money, and energy consumption over the lifetime of the building.”
While, the fundamental commissioning only to verify that the owner’s goals and objectives are met and the building systems perform as intended, the enhanced commissioning provides verification beyond the first day of occupancy and monitoring is inside the enhanced commissioning activities.
Thanks and regards.
David Posada
Integrated Design & LEED SpecialistSERA Architects
LEEDuser Expert
1976 thumbs up
September 15, 2021 - 2:08 am
Hi David,
Great question. We're working with our comissioning agent this week on the scope, specs, and Cx plan for a project pursuing both Enhanced Cx and MBCx.
I think it might actually be harder to get effective monitoring systems if you aren't doing Enhanced Cx as well.
MBCx can add another system to integrate, another layer of complexity, so the third party review of construction docs and submittals can provide more QA/QC, especially if the commissioning agent can offer input on the monitoring systems. The owner or building staff may be managing the monitoring system, and would benefit the most from knowing how they work, so having good training, documentation, an operating manual, on-going Cx plan, and the 10 month review can be even more important.
Sounds like one of those synergies we often talk about!
Dave Hubka
Practice Leader - SustainabilityEUA
LEEDuser Expert
494 thumbs up
September 15, 2021 - 6:59 am
Hello David, thanks for the response and insight.
I agree that it is more difficult to get effective monitorinng without Enh Cx and that the process of Enh Cx is very beneficial to monitor-based commissioning. Most definately synergistic.
We have a unique situation where the 10-month post occupancy visit (whether onsite or remote) is not allowed to occur due to ownership / tenant / lawyer issues....so everything is there except the 10-month post occupancy task. I am willing to sacrifice the Enh Cx points, but frustrated that all our good work on the monitor-based commissioning has to go down with the ship.