See all forum discussions about EBOM-2009 EAc1
 Subscribe to new posts about EBOM-2009 EAc1 Post a new question aboutEBOM-2009 EAc1
See LEEDuser’s guidance on EBOM-2009 EAc1»
FAQs about EAc1 :

I have a mixed-use building and am wondering if it is possible to pursue the prerequisite through Case 1. How do we proceed?

We have a building that consists of two attached structures and it’s unclear if we have to consider it a single building or if it should be certified as two separate buildings and benchmarked accordingly. How should we proceed?

How long is an Energy Star label valid to use with a streamlined approach for Case 1?

Our building includes heavy process loads that significantly increase the overall energy use in the building. If we submeter these loads, can we exclude this energy use for benchmarking purposes?

We have installed submeters on our building but the utility bill includes energy use from several other buildings located on the same campus. How do we reconcile this during the LEED review process?

When is it possible to exclude up to 10% of the building from EAp2?

What do I do if the number of building occupants, operating hours, or vacant space changes during the performance period?

If you pursue the streamlined path for an Energy Star label, should the performance period for EAc6 match the 12-month time frame of the label?

How do I account for computers with multiple monitors on Portfolio Manager?

How should I treat vacant space on Portfolio Manager?

Our building includes a large laboratory space. Can our project benchmark under the Labs21 program?

We have an international project and the space type is eligible for an Energy Star rating. Can we pursue Case 1 to demonstrate compliance given the recently released alternative compliance paths for international projects?

We have a number of buildings on a single campus that we would like to certify at the same time. Is it possible to benchmark the buildings at the campus level?

View answers »

Forum discussion

EBOM-2009 EAc1:Optimize Energy Performance

Maximum Points Available

Profile picture for user dhubka
David Hubka
Director of Operations
Transwestern Sustainability Services
LEEDuser Basic Member
355 thumbs up

The LEED O&M reference guide states that two points are available under EA Credit #1 for projects that follow Case 2 Option 2A however the LEED online template does not award credits under this option. Additionally, the LEED O&M reference guide states that seven points are available under EA Credit #1 for projects that follow Case 2 Option 2B however the LEED online template allows up to nine points. Which is correct, LEED online or the LEED reference guide? I checked the current reference guide addenda on the USGBC website and it does not address this issue. Thanks in advance for any insight that can be provided.

5
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 03/25/2011 - 18:14

David, The offline calculator includes this note: The initial 2009 Reference Guide misstated the Streamlined Approach point maximum. I think it's safe to say that you probably have a version of the RG with this problem, and the form / offline calculator is more accurate.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.