FAQs about EAp2 :

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

Lighting Power Density-Multiple Bldg Types within one building

Our Multipurpose Building is a new NCAA Division II, national broadcast basketball, academic, and exercise center for the campus. The athletic events are student-run from A/V systems to catering to lighting, and more. Not only does the basketball facility function as an NCAA game arena, but also is a live learning center for students in the department of Mass Communications. The entire building is used for educational puposes. Students also will be using the catering kitchen for classes. The practice gym is connected to the campus exercise center and may be used for intramural sports as well as physical education classes. For the reasons presented, the whole building was assigned as a “School/University” according to ASHRAE/ANSI/IES Standard 90.1 definitions. As a single building type of “School/University,” the project is under the lighting power density energy budget by 7%. This classification was deemed not appropriate in our first review by USGBC, so an alternate compliance method was examined. The whole building can be broken down into four types according to ASHRAE/ANSI/IES Standard 90.1: Exercise Center, School/University, Gymnasium, and Sports Arena. Each building area type is able to be separated by locked doors within the facility. This approach poses a new question – do each of those building areas have to meet the lighting power density energy code individually, or can it be combined as a weighted average? If the total lighting power for the four building types is combined, the building is under the total allowable power density by 6%. However, if you look at each building area individually, the “Exercise Center” and “Gymnasium” classifications are over budget, but the “Sports Arena” and “School/University” are under budget. Reasons for being over budget in the “Exercise Center” include having a high lighting level requirement coupled with high ceiling heights. The “Gymnasium” is over budget because it is designed to replicate the NCAA-required light levels (over 100fc instead of 70fc) for university basketball practice.

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Wed, 05/21/2014 - 15:16

Has anyone ever run into this before? Using 4 different building types in one building for lighting power density? Any experience you can share would be greatly appreciated!

Thu, 05/22/2014 - 07:50

More than one building type is not only allowed but expected. For example, if you have underground parking in your office building. There is no limit on the number of types as far as I'm aware. You may want to check ashrae's interperatation database for rulings on the subject.

Fri, 05/23/2014 - 17:03

In general you get more savings from the space-by-space method than the building area method.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.