FAQs about EAp2 :

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

View answers »

Forum discussion

CS-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

Lighting for Multifamily High Rise Residential Building

Hi, ASHRAE 90.1, section 9 does not apply to lighting within dwelling unit as stated in 9.1.1 footnotes. Table 9.5.1 include LPD allowance for multifamily building. Is this LDP allowance apply to enitre multifamily high rise building area that exclude dwelling unit area?

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 09/21/2012 - 13:59

It applies to the whole building I think. While dwelling unit lighting is not regulated as a prescriptive requirement it is included in tables 9.5.1 and 9.6.1.

Mon, 09/24/2012 - 06:00

Since LPD for dwelling unit is not regulated, i assume LPD allowance (from Table 9.5.1) for multifamily building applied to all other space (corridor, lobby, etc.) other than dwelling unit in a multifamily high rise building. As energy modeling purpose, LPD for dwelling unit shall be identical in proposed and baseline case. ASHREA 90.1, Table G3.1 6d) exception states "For multifamily dwelling unit...., assume identical lighting power for the proposed and baseline building designs in the simulations." Appreciate if any idea.

Mon, 09/24/2012 - 14:57

I do not think that assumption is correct. The LPD in 9.5.1 does include the whole building and must be applied to the whole building. It is correct that the dwelling unit lighting is technically not regulated and therefore should be identical. You might look beyond 90.1 for guidance on this issue. There were some LEED Interpretations on this issue that you should look up to see if they may still apply. Not sure if the Reference Guide addresses the issue. The Advanced Energy Modeling Guide for LEED does contain some guidance on this issue. Like any non-regulated load - if you want to claim savings it is up to you to establish the baseline and demonstrate savings against it.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.