Forum discussion
NC-2009 EAp2: Minimum Energy Performance
How should projects that feature life-support systems for medical purposes account for their energy loads to comply with the prerequisite? These are 24/7 systems that also require redundancy so there is a huge energy load associated with the HVAC and lighting.
Can these life-support systems be separated out in the energy model as "process" loads or categorized a different way to ensure our ability to comply? Any input is appreciated. Thanks.
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium forTo post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.
A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?
For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?
Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?
Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?
Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?
How do I provide a zip code for an international location?
For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?
For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?
Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?
How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?
The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?
Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?
Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?
Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?
Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5907 thumbs up
September 23, 2010 - 5:15 pm
Basically you are required to model the proposed building as it has been designed and in alignment with how you expect it to be operated. You should model the project as accurately as possible within reason, taking into account the amount of effort relative to effect.
So you cannot separate out any expected energy uses, they all must be included in the model. Even non-regulated, process energy loads must be included.
Lance Collins
DirectorPartner Energy
11 thumbs up
September 24, 2010 - 12:56 pm
Marcus, thank you for your reply. To give you more details on our condition......The challenge with our project is that it isa vivarium occupancy. Our understanding is the requirement for the base model to reflect the same outdoor air intake requirements as the design model. The project is interested in operating at 10 air changer per hour within the animal space, the recognition that vivariums are often designed for 15 air changes is not applied to the LEED model. The base LEED model would reflect 10 air changes as well, resulting in a zero net energy savings. Although you can take credit for reduced airflow by controls strategies, these strategies are associated with reductions from the design outdoor air requirements. Since the animals remain within the holding rooms, no reduction based on non-occupancy can be applied.
Any additional advice or input is appreciated.
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5907 thumbs up
September 24, 2010 - 1:49 pm
Yes according to the modeling protocol the ventialtion rates should be the same. In order to claim any savings you will have to follow the exceptional calculation method. You will need to prove that the 15 ACH is standard industry practice for the application. In order to do so you should cite sources which back up your claim like an ASHRAE Handbook for example.