FAQs about EAp2 :

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

LEED Project boundary and EAp2, EAc1

The project is a new facility, which has a new construction and renovation component. The new building is 6 stories tall, adjacent to an existing 3 story plus roof deck building. In our project we will build the new building and renovate floors 2 and 3 and add a roof garden to the existing building. The two structures will act as one building at the renovated floors – floor plates will flow into each other. Only the renovated floors will be utilizing the new M&E systems, the lower floors of the existing building will continue to be served by their existing system. Total square footage for the whole project is 200,000 gsf. To complicate things… we will move a few walls and fix finishes for a few rooms on the basement level of the existing building, totaling 2000 gsf. This work has been discussed with the project so far, but it will be minimal and will continue to utilize its existing M&E systems. We would like to exclude this space from our LEED project boundary (and therefore our energy model) on the basis that it is not served by our new M&E systems. Can we do that? Proposed LEED boundary: Basement level – new construction only 1st level - new construction and site work 2nd level – new construction and existing renovation of adjacent building 3rd level – new construction and existing renovation of adjacent building 4th level – new construction and existing renovation of adjacent rooftop into roof garden 5th level – new construction 6th level – new construction Biggest question is can we organize our LEED boundary vertically as outlined above? Do we need to separate the small amount of renovation work in the basement into a different phase, or a different package? (As a way to exclude this space from materials credits, construction waste management credits – since it would be excluded in the LEED boundary). Can we include only these few rooms being renovated in the basement in our LEED boundary? Or do we need to include spaces that feed these rooms (corridors, etc) as well?

3

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Mon, 10/10/2011 - 15:50

Your thinking appears correct to me. Since the basement work is minimal and can't be included in the contiguous building addtion/renovation I would treat it as a separate phase and exclude it. If you can isolate the accounting on the construction side by having a separate phase it would make it easier to isolate for LEED. Whether you need to create a separate phase or package is up to you. For EA credits it certainly makes sense to not include the basement since everything else new has new systems and is connected. So if you include the basement it must be included for every credit. You would only need to include areas affected by the renovation.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.