I was about to submit my documentation to the CaGBC, when I noticed that my LLT was not functioning properly on the WEp1c3 tab. The final result was right, but some of the numbers were coming out wrong in the middle. I've also had and heard of other people having trouble with fields that get corrupted. I really don't want to have to enter all my data into a new LLT all over again, so I downloaded a new LLT, entered the data for just that credit, printed the pdf and included that in my submission to the CaGBC with a note in the narrative explaining that the LLT had been corrupted.
Has anyone tried this before?
Also, if I fill in all the data for one LLT, and then a new one is uploaded to the website, do I need to fill it all in again, or can I just use the old one?
Lorne Mlotek
BASc., LEED AP BD+C, O+MLeadingGREEN Training and Consulting Inc, Viridis EC LLC
25 thumbs up
April 18, 2013 - 4:58 pm
Amanda,
I have experienced enough trouble with the old LLTs. The CaGBC has been pretty understanding when one or two of the LLT's credit templates malfunction. Just explicitly explain the issue in the narrative as well as summarize the outcomes for the water efficiency credits. If the reviewer ever has an issue with the submission they are not shy to tell you...so unless they say there is a problem, I am sure they will be fine with it as they have in the past. Going forward, use the new LLTs.
Charling Li
LEED Specialist, Energy & EngineeringCanada Green Building Council
November 27, 2013 - 12:02 pm
Hi Laura,
Your approach to include a narrative with the letter template to be included with the certification documentation is fine but that feedback won't reach the CaGBC until the project is submitted for certification. For more immediate feedback please email info@cagbc.org with details of the error. We do track errors and issue updates to the letter templates periodically.