See all forum discussions about NC-v4 EAp2
 Subscribe to new posts about NC-v4 EAp2 Post a new question aboutNC-v4 EAp2
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-v4 EAp2»
FAQs about EAp2 :

Do the required savings for this prerequisite (and credit) need to come only from building energy, or also process loads?

Our project doesn't have enough energy savings to earn the prerequisite. Can we get there by incorporating onsite renewables?

Our proposed design has insulation R-values that are below those prescribed by ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Can we still meet the prerequisite?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-v4 EAp2:Minimum energy performance

Leed Interpretation 1080 in lieu of MEPC

Default Avatar
susan eguia
LEED Coordinator/Construction Administrator/Business Development
Building Solutions Group, Inc.
LEEDuser Basic Member
47 thumbs up

Hi,

I'd like to ask, is anyone tried to use LI 10480 (Title-24 2016 Equivalency ) in lieu of Minimum Energy Performance Calculator (MEPC) for California project?

If, would you mind to share what are the documents need to submit for compliance?

thanks,

Susan

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user sheffer
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow
7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
4454 thumbs up

Wed, 02/06/2019 - 23:51

You will need to provide a comprehensive summary of the modeling inputs and results for both models. Essentially provide the information in the MEPC in whatever format works for you.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.