As we explore building energy efficiency, is one more energized device plugged into the internet of things really a strategy for sustainability? While a glass plaque may represent a moment in time, and be partially based upon the artificial construct of an energy model, it has a fixed embodied energy. Are we as a body of professionals moving further away from sustainability core principles as we denounce books, plaques, etc. and embrace smart phones, computers, tablets, wearables, etc. that are in need of charging, use bandwidth and power for the 'cloud', use precious mined resources, and further tether us to the energy (fossil fuel) economy, not to mention environmental impacts associated with disposal. If we are pursuing EBOM, then this is an added layer of technology that might not be needed if we have designed our original project with recertification in-mind. While I hypocritically type this on my computer, I'd like to open the debate to the community: We design buildings with an R-4 curtainwall envelope and use highly efficient systems to show energy savings and code compliance, while increasing our dependency on electronic 'things' as being green. Shouldn't we as designers, engineers, specialists and consultants be looking at strategies that promote energy savings, conservation of resources and reduction of environmental impacts a little more closely? The green building movement is supposedly no longer in its infancy. Is this the best we can do?