I’m modeling a building for C&S in France.
Normally in my baseline and proposed models I put the same infiltration (n50 = 0.14 ach) for both buildings. Even if this is an unreal case (since the renovation leads to an improvement in the permeability of the building).
I do that because, first 0.14 ach is the minimal infiltration allowed by French regulations, and second because I have never seen in the ASHRAE documentation about improve infiltration in current buildings. Even if the improve of the infiltration rate can make me gain a lot of improvement between baseline and proposed buildings energy requeriements.
Anyone of you have already experience in this specific point? Any justification is required from the USGBC if I want to change the infiltration between baseline and proposed buildings?
Thanks in advance for any comments/help on this,
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5916 thumbs up
January 10, 2013 - 2:06 pm
I tried to show savings many years ago for a residential project and our methodology was rejected. Since then I am not aware of any accepted methodologies to define a baseline and allow savings. Considerable, detailed justification would likely be required. Since 90.1 does not establish a baseline as far as I know LEED projects cannot claim savings for infiltration.