We have a project on a campus that is using the master site for some of the credits, but not SSc4.2. We are only designing two of the bldgs being certified. In the Design Review for one of the buildings (not the other, even though the bldgs supposedly have the same review team), the reviewer is asking for extra documentation: either a signed statement by the owner stating that the bike racks are exclusive to the project or provide documentation that all of the other buildings have enough bike racks. This seems to go above and beyond the credit requirements. Why does one project have to prove that other projects meet the credit requirements? Or prove that other bldgs are not using their bike racks? We are only responsible for two bldgs, and I am not even sure that the other buildings are going for SSc4.2. I would appreciate any advise here. Thanks.