See all forum discussions about NC-v4 EQc2
 Subscribe to new posts about NC-v4 EQc2 Post a new question aboutNC-v4 EQc2
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-v4 EQc2»
FAQs about EQc2 :

Is all solid wood considered inherently non-emitting? I’ve seen sources that say only solid wood flooring counts as inherently non-emitting.

Our building is atypical, and the walls and ceilings are not clearly defined. How should we classify these components? 

Are throw rugs subject to the credit requirements?

If a ceramic tile receives a top coat after it is manufactured, is it exempt from the credit requirements?

What are the adhesives and sealants to be included in the documentation?

I'm looking for a certification that tells me if a given product will meet the LEED v4 requirements, but I don't see one in a given product area. Am I missing something?

When products claim that they meet California Section 01350, does the product also meet LEED v4 requirements for low-emitting materials?

How do I know if a product complies with LEED v4 or if it was tested under an older non-compliant standard?

In past versions of LEED, it was easy to specify VOC limits. Is the specification process the same for LEED v4?

Is there a VOC budget method for this credit?

What are the limits on the VOC budget method?

Do products applied to the weather barrier need to comply with VOC thresholds? 

If one part of my multicomponent wall system is not compliant, can I still get full credit?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-v4 EQc2:Low emitting materials

How does EPA Method 24 compare to CDPH Standard Method v1.1-2010?

We finally found a Static Control Epoxy Coating for a concrete floor that meets the VOC requirement, although it only References EPA Method 24. Can this be considered equivalent to CDPH STandard Method?

1
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user ReinhardOppl
Reinhard Oppl
Independent consultant on VOC issues
formerly with Eurofins Product Testing A/S
LEEDuser Basic Member
246 thumbs up

Fri, 01/18/2019 - 21:21

Hi, EPA Method 24 cannot be considered equivalent to CDPH Standard Method. EPA Method 24 deals with VOC content IN the product BEFORE it is applied. CDPH Standard Method deals with VOC emissions FROM the surface made with this product AFTER the product was applied. It is just different issues, despite both use the term VOC. Sorry.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.