FAQs about EAp2 :

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

Fuel Rates for Non-traditional Fuel Sources

Hi All, I am working on a project where rice husk steam boiler is used for process. The fuel source (rice husk) is available at a free of cost for the project. So, as per LEED interpretation 10390, for non-traditional fuel sources that are unregulated within ASHRAE 90.1, the actual cost of the fuel shall be used in both baseline and proposed design. But if the fuel source is available at a discounted cost because it would otherwise be sent to the landfill or similarly disposed of, the project may use local rates for the baseline case and the actual rates for the proposed case. So, is it acceptable to model the proposed design with zero cost for fuel and baseline with local rates for the fuel? Kindly clarify. Thanks in advance.

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Mon, 07/10/2017 - 15:14

I sounds like this may count as an agricultural waste renewable energy fuel source. So you would use a conventional fuel like gas both model in both models and then count the rice husk fuel as a renewable. Use the same rate as the gas/oil for the renewable just like you would do with solar. This would eliminate the cost in the proposed.

Mon, 07/17/2017 - 05:11

Thanks Marcus. Since rice husk is an agricultural waster renewable energy fuel source, can we target for EA Credit 2 - On-Site Renewable Energy?

Mon, 07/17/2017 - 14:37

If it counts as renewable it counts for EAc2.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.