See all forum discussions about NC-2009 SSc6.2
 Subscribe to new posts about NC-2009 SSc6.2 Post a new question aboutNC-2009 SSc6.2
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-2009 SSc6.2»
FAQs about SSc6.2 :

Why do the requirements focus on 1-year and 2-year, 24-hour storms?

Why include the 1-year storm in the credit requirements? Won't management practices for the 2-year storm be effective?

How can green roofs count as a stormwater control measure?

How can I achieve compliance if my project's stormwater control measures are outside the LEED project boundary?

I have 100-year data—how do I convert to 2-year?

Is it an acceptable strategy to capture the rainwater into tanks and discharge it into the public sewers after the rainstorm reducing the peak discharge?

Are there special considerations for international projects?

What performance threshold do I need to achieve for an Exemplary Performance point?

The calculations for this credit are always a headache! While our projects are usually awarded the credit, the equations in the LEED Reference Guide are helpful mostly for sizing a reservoir or cistern, but don't help you get to the final results. Does US

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 SSc6.2:Stormwater Design—Quality Control

Filtering requirements

Default Avatar
Mike D
LEEDuser Basic Member
45 thumbs up

If we capture rainwater and reuse it for irrigation, do we need to show any type of filtering or will this automatically acquire the credit?

1
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user Mike Dee
Michael DeVuono
Regional Stormwater Leader
Arcadis North America
LEEDuser Expert
144 thumbs up

Tue, 10/22/2013 - 16:08

I'd take 100% TSS credit for it ... no filtrations.
Default Avatar
Mike D
LEEDuser Basic Member
45 thumbs up

Tue, 10/29/2013 - 09:52

Thanks Michael, I have received a reply back from the GBCI saying the water that is reused does not count...I'm confused now. If we are reusing all the water for irrigation, can the credit not be achieved??
Profile picture for user Mike Dee
Michael DeVuono
Regional Stormwater Leader
Arcadis North America
LEEDuser Expert
144 thumbs up

Tue, 10/29/2013 - 10:08

Would you mind posting the response. This does not compute.
Default Avatar
Mike D
LEEDuser Basic Member
45 thumbs up

Tue, 10/29/2013 - 10:10

For SSc6.2, water that is being stored for reuse is not considered - only that being discharged from the site. If some of that is from the vegetated roof, your civil engineer can determine the correct removal rate; examples are in Table 2 on page 104 of the 2009 LEED Reference Guide for Green Building Design & Construction, June 2010 edition. The probable rate would most likely be in the range of 'grass swale'.
Profile picture for user Mike Dee
Michael DeVuono
Regional Stormwater Leader
Arcadis North America
LEEDuser Expert
144 thumbs up

Tue, 10/29/2013 - 11:54

This is a shame, the reviewer is simply reading from a book and missing the entire point of this, IMO. I will bring this up at the next TAG meeting, but not sure if it will help you by the time anything gets addressed. From the BD+C manual ... "Implement a stormwater management plan the ..... promotes infiltration, and captures and treats runoff from 90% .... " OK...so you are using this for irrigation, of landscaping, outdoors .... we need to reword this somewhow, and this is going to be tough without seeing the plan. I would consider the areas you "irrigate" as infiltration "zones." It's what they are, you are putting the water back in the acquifer through these zones. To be conservative I would say that the sites discharge is held in a "stormwater vault" where TSS settle at the bottom and are not discharged...(again conservative, take 75% TSS removal even though we know it is 100%. Then the stormwater vault discharges to the vegetated "infiltration zone" which provides another 65% TSS removal. Now lets do the math...and you're probably going to need your engineer to do these calcs, and supplement local EMC rates, but an example for a hypothetical 1 acre lawn. 1 acre lawn with a TSS EMC of 180 mg/l produces an approximate runoff volume of 0.28 acre-feet which in turn produces 133.7 lbs of TSS. Our target removal: 133.7 lbs(0.80) = 106.96 lbs First flush through our "vault" = 133.7(.80) = 100.28 lbs removed 33.425 lbs remain We then route through the "infiltration zone" 33.425(0.60) = 20.055 lbs removed Total removal = 120.33 lbs = 90% TSS removal Or something like that.
Default Avatar
Mike D
LEEDuser Basic Member
45 thumbs up

Tue, 10/29/2013 - 12:24

Thanks for this. Yes, the water is being reused for irrigation and toilet flushing so we all assumed it was 100% TSS removal. Just as a note, the comment received was by contacting GBCI; the project has not been reviewed yet but we wanted to double check this approach was fine.
Profile picture for user Mike Dee
Michael DeVuono
Regional Stormwater Leader
Arcadis North America
LEEDuser Expert
144 thumbs up

Tue, 10/29/2013 - 12:44

The toilet flushing thing, I can see their point. But I would not use the toilet water as part of my runoff number. If they aren't considering that runoff, then don't use that as part of your numbers.
Default Avatar
Mike D
LEEDuser Basic Member
45 thumbs up

Tue, 10/29/2013 - 13:49

Yes, I won't use this number. But I am puzzled about why we cannot use the rest of the water as irrigation for the green roof. The project is a zero lot line and no water would be discharged.. I would think this achieves the credit..
Profile picture for user Mike Dee
Michael DeVuono
Regional Stormwater Leader
Arcadis North America
LEEDuser Expert
144 thumbs up

Tue, 10/29/2013 - 14:29

You're preaching to the choir here. Those GBCI responses aren't "official" so you're reviewer may agree with your approach. This is the first I have ever heard of this not counting, and we have recommended this approach on this site for quite some time. To be safe, if you follow the creative wording above, I think you will be okay. Goo dluck, and keep us posted.
Default Avatar
Mike D
LEEDuser Basic Member
45 thumbs up

Wed, 10/30/2013 - 15:58

Many thanks for your help Michael much appreciated. In another project, the team would like to install a filter but is not sure which size of the filter to choose. They are thinking of 15 microns. Is that ok? What would be the typical size of TSS?
Profile picture for user Mike Dee
Michael DeVuono
Regional Stormwater Leader
Arcadis North America
LEEDuser Expert
144 thumbs up

Wed, 10/30/2013 - 16:17

I would consult with the manufacturer and have them specify the product that achieves the desired results. A suspended solid is anything from a soda can to a fleck of dust.
Profile picture for user Mike Dee
Michael DeVuono
Regional Stormwater Leader
Arcadis North America
LEEDuser Expert
144 thumbs up

Wed, 11/13/2013 - 19:36

Not to drudge up an older topic, but the BD+C reference manual, page 103, under "Structural Measures" specifically deals with what you are proposing.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.