You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium forForum discussion
NC-2009 EAc3: Enhanced Commissioning
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium forTo post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.
Chris Ladner
PartnerViridian
261 thumbs up
July 27, 2010 - 3:05 pm
The CxA should be reviewing, not developing, the OPR/BOD for content and scope. It is not unreasonable for the CxA to provide a template for the owner and/or designer to use as a guide when completing the OPR/BOD. We use a template that includes suggested scope and associated questions to help the owner/designer contemplate the kinds of issues that should be defined in the OPR and BOD. This template can be very usefull during OPR development meetings. All that being said, the final document must be confirmed and approved by the owner(OPR) or designer(BOD).