FAQs about EAp2 :

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

ECS - Other clg Accessories under Primary Cooling

We would like to find out what have been included in item "Other Clg Accessories" under Primary Cooling in Energy Consumption Summary. In our baseline, Package Terminal Heat Pump is adopted. The Energy Consumption Summary is generated. Just to test out how much more efficient VRV system will be compared to Package Terminal Heat Pump, we simple change the equipement type to VRF heat pump without changing anything else in the program. Again, the summary is generated. We were expecting there would be some engery saving but surprisely found out it was not the case. when zooming into details, we discovered that the Other clg Accessories under Primary Coolig increased significantly althought Cooling Compressor Load reduced. Can someone advice what is going on? Btw, we are using Trace 700 for the energy modeling. Thanks in advance.

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Tue, 12/11/2012 - 13:53

You can usually find more detail in the Equipment Energy Consumption report that helps to breakdown the usage. Beyond that we do not use Trace but I would call Trace since you are already paying for their customer support or post your question on the Trace Users listserv at onebuilding.org

Wed, 12/12/2012 - 03:15

Hi, Marcus Thanks for your reply. Yes, I sent the query to Trane helpdesk at the same time but only got a generic reply from them. Anyway, this moring I found the answer after printing out the equipment energy consumption as suggested by you. To share my finding here, Other Clg Accessories Load comprised of loads of Control Panel and interlock / Heat pump defrost cycle etc, which have been preset in the program. For example, the default value of VRV Control panel & interlocks is 0.5kw while Package Terminal unit is only 0.1kw. This results in the significant difference. Thank you.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.