FAQs about EAp2 :

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

EAp2

We are working on a huge project in Riyadh, to meet EAp2 we sould look for a water cooled chiller due to the area of the project and the challenge to reach a COP near to 8 to meet the 10% from baseline. The water represent a challenge in KSA even in using industrial water. Is there a way or a system that can help to resolve this issue.

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Tue, 08/09/2016 - 21:33

Air-cooled chiller is an option. I see lots of project in Argentina achieving LEED certifications with these. Although Air-cooled will probably have less efficiency than water cooled systems this is not always the case, and you can find extremely efficient air-cooled chillers that will perform better than ASHRAE minimum. Also have in mind that you can achieve energy savings in many other ways, for example by reducing cooling demand, reducing installed lighting power, installing efficient AC, etc. Did I answer your question?

Wed, 08/10/2016 - 03:06

Thanks for your reply. I searched a lot for a brand of air cooled chiller that can reach coefficient of performance near to 8 but I can't find. I need also to ask if the baseline can be an air cooled chiller since the area is 19000m2

Wed, 08/10/2016 - 04:09

Baseline HVAC system for non-residential building with 19000 m² of conditioned floor area, is System 8 or 7 (depending on what heating source you have). In either case Baseline system is water-cooled chillers. - The Baseline number, type and size of chillers should be acording to TABLE G3.1.3.7. - Chillers COP depends on chiller size and type, you should reference TABLE 6.8.1C Water Chilling Packages–Minimum Efficiency Requirements, either 'Water cooled, electrically operated, positive displacement (rotary screw and scroll)' or 'Water cooled, electrically operated, centrifugal'. - Maximum COP for baseline's chillers, is 5.50 (screw) and 6.40 centrifugal, again this could be lower depending on size. For your actual building design, you can choose which ever system you like as long as the efficiency is better than 90.1 Section 6.4 and Tables 6.8.1 and you achieve greater savings than 10% over baseline.

Tue, 08/16/2016 - 15:55

I am not aware of any exceptions for using air cooled systems instead of water cooled when it is a system 7 or 8. If there is an efficiency loss you simply have to make it up elsewhere to meet the minimum % savings.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.