Hi all,
I am looking for some guidance on a project that I’m working on. It is an extension to an existing pharma building, with the extension seeking LEED certification. The new extension has its own dedicated plant for the most part, however, it is receiving hot water (heating only) from a central boiler plant located in the existing building. I have the following questions if you could please provide some insight.
Do I have the option to follow either Addendum ai or the DES guidance document (Option 1 or Option 2) to model the district heating energy?
Does Addendum ai allow you to take advantage of the efficiency of the upstream boiler plant, or do you have to follow DES Guidance Option 2 (full accounting) to do this?
Addendum ai states the same heating source shall be used in the proposed and baseline building design. I assume you set the boiler efficiency the same for both the proposed and baseline models. Is it set to the minimum boiler efficiency requirements outlined in 90.1 Table 6.8.1F?
If following the DES Guidance Option 2, is it sufficient to account for the upstream equipment that is only related to the new building that is seeking LEED certification, e.g. for the project I am working on, they installed a new hot water distribution header in the central plant room (part of existing building) with a new set of dedicated pumps to serve the new extension. Thus, are these pumps and the boiler plant the only equipment I am required to include as part of DES Option 2? There are other distribution pumps serving the existing building.
There are two lab spaces within the new extension that have RH requirements. I assume I will set up a humidifier in the baseline design with the same parameters as the proposed, however, I doubt the energy consumption associated with the humidifiers will be the same between the proposed and baseline. Is it a requirement that the humidifier results are the same? Or do I simply add the proposed humidifier energy consumption to the baseline results afterwards?
The lab spaces in the proposed design have high air change rates to maintain the RH within the space. Is assigning the fan power limitation pressure drop adjustments to the baseline model, based on the added filtration in the proposed design, the only way to account for this additional proposed fan energy in the baseline?
Any help is appreciated.
Dónal
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5909 thumbs up
December 19, 2017 - 10:11 am
Yes you can follow the DESv2 or apply addendum ai.
Under ai the heating source is purchased energy so there is no boiler efficiency.
You must account for the plant components, new and old that provide the hot water to the building.
Model the humidifier identically and it is understood that the energy use will not be the same.
Look at the other pressure drop adjustements to see if any may apply to your design. Hard for me to say.
Dónal O'Connor
December 19, 2017 - 4:40 pm
Hi Marcus, thank you for your response and guidance. I’ve got one final question if you don’t mind. In relation to Table 1 in the DES guidance document, is it a mandatory requirement that you must follow DES Option 1 if you don’t exceed the DES Option 2 points floor (6 points for NC v2009)? The reason I ask is because we are struggling for savings and there’s a couple of extra points available to us if we model the full upstream equipment in Option 2 (we have all the equipment data for this plant). However, we won’t exceed the 6 point cap. It is my understanding that if we follow addendum ai, there are no point caps/floors, however, addendum ai will give similar results to DES Option 1 which is what we’re hoping to avoid.
Thanks,
Dónal
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5909 thumbs up
December 20, 2017 - 10:56 am
That is correct. The use of the DESv2 is optional in LEED 2009. If you use addendum ai there is no points cap.
Dónal O'Connor
December 20, 2017 - 6:08 pm
Thanks for clarifying Marcus.