Forum discussion

NC-v4 INc1:Innovation

Design for Active Occupants in mixed-use building

I'm wondering if anyone has any insights into applying this credit to a building with distinct spaces/occupancies. A common building type we work with is an academic building adjoining a dorm. So there's some basically one story or low-rise public space, and then multiple floors limited to residents. A dorm is often a good candidate for this credit as the stairs are accessible from all floors and  fitness amenities are common, but I'm wondering if anyone has experience assessing which requirements are met when not all occupants are served by the same stairs/amenities. 

 

For example, a 2-story academic podium with 8-story residential tower - if all floors are accessible by stair, but only the academic stair meets enough of the openness/lighting/etc requirements, can the project as a whole qualify?

 

Or, a dorm with a fitness center that is only accessible by residents - would academic/admin staff also need access to meet that requirement?

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 08/24/2018 - 17:16

The main criteria says that "Access to floors may be restricted by use of security devices, such as card keys, codes or other access devices", so I would think as long as the occupants of any floors above ground level have the physical ability (i.e. the staircase(s) exist), it's ok if they're not necessarily allowed access to every floor. This would be common in a high-rise office building, which often has some retail component on the ground level. If a business on the 5th floor only has key access to their floor, they can still use the stairs from the ground level to get up to their floor if they want to. I would think those occupants on the ground level who have no use for the upper floors (i.e. they're visiting retail or another service) would be exempt from needing to have access to the other areas at all. Of course, unless that's explicitly stated, it'd be a guess from our standpoint. I'd probably write up a short narrative to GBCI or LEED Coach, explain the logic in a way that's not necessarily asking them if your project will comply, but more asking for clarity of the requirements (otherwise, they'll say to submit a CIR), and see what they come back with. 

Fri, 08/24/2018 - 18:24

Thanks, that makes sense. It's kind of a tricky credit to apply to a residential or academic building anyway, since a lot of the language does seem to reference a commercial multi-tenant office building like you describe. I'm going to submit one soon where the fitness center thing is the only potential issue, so I'll see what happens there, but as more and more of these university projects are writing wellness into their requirements I imagine we'll be targeting this credit more and more. If the more complex project with the 2-story academic portion ends up pursuing this I'll try to get a more detailed answer from USGBC.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.