FAQs about EAp2 :

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

DES or NO DES?

In this project, we have one office, two plants signed up for LEED Campus. Cooling & Heating for these plant buildings comes from Chillers & Boilers located in centrally located plant in the campus. This centally located plant also serves cooling/heating to some other buildings in the campus which is not included in the LEED boundary. The office biulding (3rd one in the LEED boundary) is cooled & heated by its own systems located inside the building.

In this situation, does the DES modeling method apply? Can we do all the buildings seperately following 90.1-Appendix G w/o any addendum? Are there any USGBC document which describes the conditions for the DES criteria?

 

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Sun, 10/15/2017 - 16:21

The DES guidance is required under LEED v4. It is now contained within the Reference Guide.

Mon, 10/16/2017 - 21:26

This project is under LEED-2009 where DES is still an option. In my understanding this project does not qualify for DES option. There are no cogen plant. These chillers are straight up feeding these buildings & plants. But these chillers, cooling tower & boilers are located in a centralized location. What do you think should I model this as DES?

Mon, 10/16/2017 - 21:46

If a central plant serves multiple buildings and some are outside the LEED project boundary then it is a DES. Your original post indicates some buildings are served by the central plant and are outside the LEED boundary so that sounds like you have a DES. Your most recent post says that the central plant only serves these buildings, so I am a bit confused. If your project includes the central plant building(s) then it is still a DES for the office building but some of the load goes to other buildings.

Mon, 10/16/2017 - 23:23

Appreciate your answer very much. Thank you. 3 Buildings in LEED boundary - 2 plants, 1 office. These two Plant buildings are served by 2 Chillers & 2 boilers. These chillers/boilers are located in a centrally located building where there is one more chiller & a boiler. The other Chiller/Boiler serves 2 more plants which is not included in LEED boundary. The office itself large RTUs, not connected with the chillers. If I model two chillers in these two plants separately - it will show the proper energy usage. But I was confused if I have to model the entire plant as DES, so I asked this?Do you still think it should be a DES? Sorry for the confusion.

Tue, 10/17/2017 - 14:49

I can't tell from your description. Usually a central plant is a single building which houses chillers and/or boilers that make hot and/or chilled water and distribute it to multiple buildings. In your case you seem to have multiple central plant buildings? Do the plant buildings within your LEED boundary house boilers/chillers? It sounds like the office is contains all HVAC for that building within that building. So this issue is just related to the other 2 plant buildings. When you say a plant building I interpret that to mean a building that houses a central plant with boilers/chillers. Maybe that is not what you mean. So provide more information of what is contained within the plant buildings inside the boundary.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.