See all forum discussions about NC-2009 EAp2
 Subscribe to new posts about NC-2009 EAp2 Post a new question aboutNC-2009 EAp2
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-2009 EAp2»
FAQs about EAp2 :

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

DES Condenser Water System

We're working on a small project (7,500 SF) pursuing LEED NC v2009 designed with water-source VRFs served by a shared central condenser water system with cooling towers, boilers, and pumping. The CW system is located entirely off-site (outside the LEED project boundary) and serves multiple buildings within a LEED Campus boundary. CIR #5234 provides some guidance on the issue, but not enough for a clear understanding of how to handle this particular system. The definition of a DES within the LEED DES Guidelines doesn't directly apply to CW systems, but we're still unclear on how to appropriately account for this system and what approach to take. Question #1: Do we have to follow the LEED DES Guidelines? If so, how do we handle the Baseline system (would be System #3). Question #2: Are we allowed to segment the central plant capacity - meaning since I know the percentage of the central plant attributed to this building can I model an on-site plant configured like the central plant but with reduced capacities, flows, etc?

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Default Avatar
Haojie Wang
Energy Modeler
KJWW Engineering
LEEDuser Basic Member
3 thumbs up

Wed, 03/30/2016 - 18:46

Are you reading DES v2? They have two options. Options 1 is to use virtual utility rate and model the central plant cost-neutral in proposed and baseline. But in your case, I think option 2 is better suited for you since you have more efficient cooling plant. And your central plant is just cooling tower, you can just model it as on-site plant, which is described in detail in DES v2.

Tue, 04/05/2016 - 13:57

Thanks for your response. I think the issue here is that condenser water systems are not directly covered in DES v2 and technically the primary space heating/cooling is being performed on site with the plant serving more as a heat sink. This entire system (cooling tower, boilers, pumps) is located offsite with this building only accounting for ~10% of the total load on the plant. If I pursue Option 2, then part-load operation becomes a concern because this building accounts for such a small percentage of the total capacity. My previous questions was "Are we allowed to segment the central plant capacity - meaning since I know the percentage of the central plant attributed to this building can I model an on-site plant configured like the central plant but with reduced capacities, flows, etc?"

Tue, 04/05/2016 - 13:59

Thanks for your response. I think the issue here is that condenser water systems are not directly covered in DES v2 and technically the primary space heating/cooling is being performed on site with the plant serving more as a heat sink. This entire system (cooling tower, boilers, pumps) is located offsite with this building only accounting for ~10% of the total load on the plant. If I pursue Option 2, then part-load operation becomes a concern because this building accounts for such a small percentage of the total capacity. My previous questions was "Are we allowed to segment the central plant capacity - meaning since I know the percentage of the central plant attributed to this building can I model an on-site plant configured like the central plant but with reduced capacities, flows, etc?"
Profile picture for user sheffer
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow
7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
4454 thumbs up

Mon, 04/25/2016 - 16:39

You are not required to use the DESv2 but if you don't you will need to justify your own modeling protocol for the situation. Even though the system you have is not directly addressed you can apply the same principle in the DESv2 to your situation. Under Option 2 you model a virtual central plant that is on-site and sized to your project. See section 2.4.1.2.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.