FAQs about EAp2 :

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

DES CHP

Hello

I have a LEED 2009 HC project with DES CHP and tough review.   Is it true that the only way to satisfy the requirements for EAp2/EAc1, using the Aug 12, 2010 Guidelines Option 2, with eQuest is to run the proposed eQuest model without CHP and account for the CHP contribution to Proposed building energy (Electric, Thermal and Fuel) via Appendix D arithmetic and account for the CHP_ELECBLDG and ProposedBLDGFUEL  as a Proposed energy line item in Table EAp2-5?

I have, in the past included the CHP in the eQuest model by scaling the CHP size (kW) based on, CHP_ELECBLDG , using annual average efficiency and flat engine curve and run the CHP in the eQuest model (track thermal);  then entering the simulation results on Table EAp2-5 as electric and fuel line items for each energy use.  I have used this approach successfully in the past on a certified building.  Was the reviewer for that project just sloppy?

With gratitude for your anticipated response,

Melissa

 

 

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 05/04/2018 - 14:16

It is hard to say anything about what the reviewer is seeing (or not) without all the specifics. Prior reviews do not establish a precedence and individual reviewers are people not machines, so the results can somewhat vary. The two methods you describe sound very similar. The biggest difference is that you are not showing your calculations when you do it within eQUEST. Perhaps the reviewer would have a higher confidence if they saw the calcs. Is the result substantially different with the two methods? If it is then I might spend some time figuring out why because they should produce similar results.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.