FAQs about EAp2 :

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

Demand Control Ventilation

Further, to the preliminary review of EAp2 our project team got a comment with regard to demand control ventilation (DCV). however, although the project includes spaces larger than 500 sf, none of those ha a design occupancy of greater than 40 people per 1.000 sf of floor area. Would a notification of the occupancy not exceeding 40 people/1,000 sf be sufficient to justify why DCV is not required to our project? Thank you in advance.

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 09/26/2014 - 13:59

That would be a start. It is always a good idea to back up your claims, statements and notifications with documentation. In this case you could point to the calculations for IEQp1. Make sure that you are not contradicting yourself in documentation submitted for another credit. Projects usually get this comment when they show a space as having 40 people per 1000 in the documentation for IEQp1 or if there is a large gathering space in the project like an auditorium where this density is likely at peak ventilation requirements.

Sat, 09/27/2014 - 17:13

Thank you Marcus. We are not contradicting ourselves with IEQp1 since no space exceeds the threshold (40pax/1,000sf). Although there is an auditorium in the project, occupancy will be still lower than 40pax/1,000sf. However, although DCV is not required (based on not exceeding the occupancy threshold) all large areas (>500sf) of our project are equipped with carbon dioxide sensors allowing for demand control ventilation.

Sat, 09/27/2014 - 17:18

Perhaps the reviewer saw the auditorium and this is why they raised the question. State that the auditorium is under 40/1000 and provide the max occupancy and total square footage for that (and any similar) spaces in your response.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.