"Provide dedicated bike lanes that extend at least to the end of the school property in 2 or more directions with no barriers (e.g., fences) on school property." This requirement seems vague in the actual purpose but very explicit in the requirement. The credit purpose is to encourage bike use. The bike lane part is I assume for safety, but school campuses have many possible configurations and this requirement needs to be less rigid to allow for solutions that work with campus plan, layout and logistics.
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
Jorge Arismendi
Civil EngineerPBK Architects
20 thumbs up
June 18, 2010 - 5:42 pm
What is the minimum bicycle path/sidewalk's width for an Elementary School project pursuing LEED credit SSc4.2? 8 foot?
Thanks
Ben Stanley
Senior Sustainability ManagerWSP - Built Ecology
LEEDuser Expert
250 thumbs up
June 21, 2010 - 10:58 am
During previous applications, the LEED review team has requested an 8ft path to accommodate shared pedestrian/bike use.
I haven't seen a prescriptive requirement for the width of a stand alone bike path.
Jorge Arismendi
Civil EngineerPBK Architects
20 thumbs up
July 5, 2010 - 12:25 pm
Thanks for your response Mr. Stanley.
Rebecca Grant
DOWA-IBI Group Architects20 thumbs up
October 31, 2012 - 4:12 pm
We have a suburban middle school that is bounded by neighborhood houses on three sides (E, S, W) and a street on one side (N). Access (vehicular and bicycle) to the site can only be provided from the north side. Are we meeting the credit intent if we provide a shared-use pathway (bikes and pedestrians sufficiently sized and marked with pavement painting, signage, etc.) along the east side of the site to the NE corner and along the west side of the site to the NW corner so that bicyclists and pedestrians can head off in the east and west directions?
David Posada
Integrated Design & LEED SpecialistSERA Architects
LEEDuser Expert
1980 thumbs up
November 1, 2012 - 3:38 am
Sounds like you meet the credit intent as long as those paths originate close enough to the buildings and bike parking areas for uninterrupted travel.
Rebecca Grant
DOWA-IBI Group Architects20 thumbs up
November 1, 2012 - 1:48 pm
David, the shared-use pathways will originate at the building entrance/drop-off area where the bicycle parking spaces are located. And yes we would provide uninterrupted travel paths.
Rebecca Grant
DOWA-IBI Group Architects20 thumbs up
November 6, 2012 - 12:20 pm
David,
I have a follow-up question on the bicycle lanes. We have shared-use bicycle and pedestrian lanes. We will indicate separation between the two modes with symbols - bicycle on one side and pedestrian on the other, and signage explaining how the shared-use pathway should be used. We will not provide a divider/separation line down the middle of the pathway. Does this meet the credit intent?
Thanks, Rebecca
David Posada
Integrated Design & LEED SpecialistSERA Architects
LEEDuser Expert
1980 thumbs up
November 26, 2012 - 4:08 pm
That sounds reasonable - especially if the symbols appear more than just at the beginning and end of the path. The "clear separation" on pg 52 of the RG appears to be more for bike lanes alongside car travel lanes.