Is anyone else concerned about the structure of this draft, in that the Integrative Process credit is floating off by itself, outside of any category? Human beings can probably handle that concept, but automated systems relying on data structures will struggle with it. In fact, most will probably have to invent their own category to contain this credit, even if they have to call it the "unclassified credits" category.
Here in LEEDuser, for example, our navigation structure depends on choosing a rating system, then a category, then a credit. Without a category, I don't know how we would lead users to the credit. I strongly encourage USGBC to go ahead and establish the category, even if it only contains one credit, just so everyone uses the same category name.
