FAQs about EAp2 :

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

View answers »

Forum discussion

CS-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

Core and Shell Building with Tenant Improvement

We have been contracted to design a core and shell building for a large office building. We applied for Core and Shell for LEED 2009. In the middle of our design process, a tenant hired us to build out the space. The tenant space includes office spaces and a large-scale data center (>1000 kW). I see two approaches to complete the energy model for the tenant improvement areas; 1) use the tenant improvement design to establish the HVAC system, lighting system, and process loads (including the >1000 data center) similar to new construction, or 2) use Table G-C and Table G-D to establish non-regulated loads and use the code-based lighting and HVAC system for both baseline and proposed models. Clearly the right approach is to switch this project from Core and Shell to New Construction. However, the tenant is not interested. Without the tenant involvement, it is unlikely that we will achieve minimum energy performance. As part the Core and Shell team, we want to certify the building. The only way to achieve the goal of the owner is to use approach 2. Comments? CURTIS CLARK PE, LEED AP BD+C SUSTAINABILITY SERVICES

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 16:15

Sounds right from a LEED requirement perspective. Since the TI is not in the CS scope of work you only have to model your CS scope of work and can assume default values in the tenant spaces. Too bad the tenant is not on board. You are also correct that the right thing to do is model it as it will be occupied.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.