See all forum discussions about NC-2009 SSc4.4
 Subscribe to new posts about NC-2009 SSc4.4 Post a new question aboutNC-2009 SSc4.4
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-2009 SSc4.4»
FAQs about SSc4.4 :

How does one account for off-site parking. Should the LEED boundary encompass this parking? Or alternatively may the project pursue the "no new parking" option?

If a project does not provide parking onsite but provides a shuttle service to new parking offsite, is that considered “no new parking” since the new parking is not onsite?

Does rebuilding an existing parking area with fewer spaces mean “no new parking”?

If a non-residential project wants to use Option 4, which references the  ITE Parking Generation Study, where does one upload and submit required documentation? There is no Option 4 choice in the credit form.

How do you designate preferred parking if the parking facility is not under the owner's control?

How does one apply minimum zoning requirements to a project when it is part of a larger complex or campus?

Are there standards regarding how to document the spaces that will be dedicated as reserved?

How does a carpool/vanpool relate to a shared car service/company when it comes to the preferred parking requirements of this credit?

Should I consider motorbikes and parking spaces for them under this credit? What about fleet vehicles?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 SSc4.4:Alternative Transportation—Parking Capacity

Combined car pooling + LEV signage for projects < 10 spaces

Hi all, I can see from a few discussions on here that it seems acceptable to combine carpooling + LEV signage provided there is no double counting i.e. a total of 10% of spaces are reserved. However if the project has a total of less than 10 spaces then it would only be required to provide one appropriately signed space to satisfy both SSc4.3 & 4.4. I assume this is an appropriate compliance strategy but any thoughts, suggestions or alternative points of view?

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user tristanroberts
Tristan Roberts
Representative
Vermont House of Representatives
LEEDuser Expert
7780 thumbs up

Fri, 11/27/2015 - 04:56

Lewis, if you're trying to earn both credits, the parking spaces allocated should be additive, not conflated. I don't see how you can earn both credits with just one spot.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.