Hello Everyone-
I'm currently working on a project where the local code defines no minimum amount of open space. Instead, they define a maximum amount of open space (at 19% of site area).
So... the site has a zoning requirement but it's a maximum, not minimum, so we can't use either option 1 or 2. We're trying to determine if we can submit as alternate compliance or if we should submit as option 3 (existing ordinance but no open space requirement). Any thoughts?
Devon Bertram
Sustainability ManagerYR&G
214 thumbs up
November 9, 2011 - 12:32 pm
I would think submitting as option 3 would be the best option, however this requires 20% of the project's site area which exceeds the maximum amount allowed by zoning for your project (19%). Would your project be able to get an allowance to achieve 20% of the site area as open space? If not, it sounds like the credit may not be achievable for the project, however I suggest submitting an inquiry to GBCI to confirm.
Elliot Powers, LEED AP BD+C
45 thumbs up
November 9, 2011 - 7:26 pm
Hi Daniel:
Perhaps you've already thought of this, but maybe you can approach the local authorities and seek a variance that allows you that additional 1%, particularly when you present what should be a palatable reason. Don't know the size of the site, but the additional 1% may not represent a whole lot of space. Just a thought. Good luck.