Hello Everyone- I'm currently working on a project where the local code defines no minimum amount of open space. Instead, they define a maximum amount of open space (at 19% of site area). So... the site has a zoning requirement but it's a maximum, not minimum, so we can't use either option 1 or 2. We're trying to determine if we can submit as alternate compliance or if we should submit as option 3 (existing ordinance but no open space requirement). Any thoughts?

Post a reply

Devon Bertram

Sustainability Manager

YR&G

LEEDuser Basic Member

151 thumbs up

Wed, 11/09/2011 - 17:32

I would think submitting as option 3 would be the best option, however this requires 20% of the project's site area which exceeds the maximum amount allowed by zoning for your project (19%). Would your project be able to get an allowance to achieve 20% of the site area as open space? If not, it sounds like the credit may not be achievable for the project, however I suggest submitting an inquiry to GBCI to confirm.

Elliot Powers, LEED AP BD+C

LEEDuser Basic Member

37 thumbs up

Thu, 11/10/2011 - 00:26

Hi Daniel: Perhaps you've already thought of this, but maybe you can approach the local authorities and seek a variance that allows you that additional 1%, particularly when you present what should be a palatable reason. Don't know the size of the site, but the additional 1% may not represent a whole lot of space. Just a thought. Good luck.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.

You are currently logged in under an enterprise account

FAQs about SSc5.2 :

Code defines Maximum Open Space

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

Add new comment