FAQs about EAp2 :

Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the p

Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-2009 EAp2:Minimum Energy Performance

Clarification on the use of ACMV system

I am currently working on a project in Kenya. The cooling load for the commercial office tower is around 1900RT. This project will attempt for LEED CS and will be targeting Silver rating. Water-cooled chillers are rarely used in Kenya due to the unreliability of water supply and with a less harsh climatic conditions, air-cool chillers seems to be more popular. However, the developer does not wish to provide ACMV system for the tenanted space. The performance and specification will be included in the tenancy agreement and tenants' fit out work shall adhere to those guidelines. Noting that this project is attempting LEED certification, the modeling baseline will be System 8 with chiller COP of 6.1. My question is: 1. Will GBCI disqualify this project if the developer if not providing ACMV system for the tenanted space but only for the core and shell? 2. Will GBCI penalize this project if the entire 1900RT is addressed solely by individual VRF/VRV system instead of water-cooled or air-cooled chiller system? Much appreciate your comments. Thank you. Rgds, Andrew Principal ESD Consultant

0

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Thu, 10/29/2015 - 14:00

1. No it will not be disqualified. 2. Whether there will be any penalties is hard to say. To claim any energy savings you will need to include ACMV requirements in the tenant lease agreements. Without them the ACMV system would need to be modeled identically to the baseline in the tenant spaces. I think you will need to run the models to see if there is a penalty. If there is then consider trying to attain savings in lighting or other end uses. Again you will need a requirement in the tenant lease agreement to claim savings in those spaces.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.