Has anyone had success with (2) 2-hr sessions being accepted as compliant (by GBCI) for the integrated design team charrette? Also, any reason virtual mtgs (using platform like gottomeeting) wouldn't be acceptable as the Charrette meeting forum?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Go premium for
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
5867 thumbs up
February 20, 2015 - 9:33 am
Sounds like both would likely be acceptable to me. The important part is that the team does the analysis and meets to discuss it and how it can inform the development of the design.
That said there are obvious reasons why meeting in person is a better option, especially early in design.
Vince Briones
Sustainable Design ManagerAtkins
15 thumbs up
February 20, 2015 - 2:47 pm
Marcus- thx so much for the quick reply. Agreed on your observations. In this particular case, the project is relatively small, with a rather quick schedule and the design team hails from multiple cities so we're in need of a nimble tele-commuting solution to facilitate our integrated team discussions. The owner team will be in physical attendance with several of the design team stakeholders.