See all forum discussions about NC-v4 IPc1
 Subscribe to new posts about NC-v4 IPc1 Post a new question aboutNC-v4 IPc1
See LEEDuser’s guidance on NC-v4 IPc1»
FAQs about IPc1 :

This is the only credit in the IP credit category. Do all teams have to pursue it?

Do we have to adopt all strategies that improve energy or water performance based on the analysis?

View answers »

Forum discussion

NC-v4 IPc1:Integrative process

Charrette duration / delivery flexible?

Default Avatar
Vince Briones
Sustainable Design Manager
LEEDuser Basic Member
15 thumbs up

Has anyone had success with (2) 2-hr sessions being accepted as compliant (by GBCI) for the integrated design team charrette? Also, any reason virtual mtgs (using platform like gottomeeting) wouldn't be acceptable as the Charrette meeting forum?

0
Post a reply

You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?

LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.

Go premium for $15.95  »

Profile picture for user sheffer
Marcus Sheffer
LEED Fellow
7group / Energy Opportunities
LEEDuser Expert
4454 thumbs up

Fri, 02/20/2015 - 14:33

Sounds like both would likely be acceptable to me. The important part is that the team does the analysis and meets to discuss it and how it can inform the development of the design. That said there are obvious reasons why meeting in person is a better option, especially early in design.
Default Avatar
Vince Briones
Sustainable Design Manager
LEEDuser Basic Member
15 thumbs up

Fri, 02/20/2015 - 19:47

Marcus- thx so much for the quick reply. Agreed on your observations. In this particular case, the project is relatively small, with a rather quick schedule and the design team hails from multiple cities so we're in need of a nimble tele-commuting solution to facilitate our integrated team discussions. The owner team will be in physical attendance with several of the design team stakeholders.

Add new comment

To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.