Case 1 and Case 2 are distinguished by whether your CI is more than 75% of the building or not. But Option 2 reads very differently depending on which case you are. Option 2 of Case 1 indicates that no parking can be provided or subsidized for tenants, whereas Option 2 of Case 2 merely says that no new parking is added. So you can occupy 80% of a building which comes with structured tenant parking provided and achieve this credit as long as you add the carpool signage. However if you only occupy 74% of this same building, you could not achieve this credit at all. Does anyone understand the thinking here?
You rely on LEEDuser. Can we rely on you?
LEEDuser is supported by our premium members, not by advertisers.
Add new comment
To post a comment, you need to register for a LEEDuser Basic membership (free) or login to your existing profile.