Under Case 1, we got comments from the reviewer as follows:

"Case 1 - Lease
The LEED Credit Form has been provided stating that the project occupies 1.2% of the base building and therefore applies Case 1. The
project has negotiated a lease where energy costs are paid by the tenant and not included in the base rent. An excerpt of the lease
documenting the energy cost agreement has been provided.

However, it is unclear whether the electric and chilled water cooling from the central plant are prorated and are a true proration of the
quantities used. The LEED Reference Guide for Interior Design and Construction, 2009 Edition, states: The typical approach, where the
landlord prorates the utilities based on the tenant portion of the total leasable area, meets the credit requirement. Flat rates set by the
landlord at the time of lease negotiation do not satisfy the requirement. The tenant payments must be a proration of the true quantities
used, and the landlord needs to present the tenant this information and keep a written record.

TECHNICAL ADVICE:
Please provide documentation, such as a letter from the building manager and a copy of the written record of utility quantities used, to
demonstrate that cooling (electric and chilled water) is a proration of the true quantities used.

Three points are denied pending clarifications."

The lease agreement indicates charge of air-conditioning services at price per square meter per hour and an extra monthly fixed rate in case the occupant requires 24-hour air-conditioning for server room. Should this be enough? If not, what additional information do we need to provide?

Thank you.