I understand that the final result must be that the project implements five distinct design strategies. What is more difficult to grasp is how the "Design with nature documentation template" seems to focus more on the process of exploring and the hurdles of implementation (critical timing issues associated with each strategy). There is even new information that is not part of the credit language (mention of project phase, stakeholders, timing issues). While I know the template is not mandatory, it really did confuse me as to what was actually required to be documented. I ended up modifying it quite a bit to reflect more the credit language and shifting the narrative so that the design strategies are more at the forefront.
My question is, am I the only one that felt this way, or am I missing pieces of information ?
